Legal Opinion

Spokane & Eastern Trust Co. v. Hart

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1923No. 17667PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, C. J.

In general terms, this is an action to restrain the guaranty fund board from enforcing, as against the plaintiff, any of the provisions of the state guaranty act as amended in 1921. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in a judgment favorable to the plaintiff’s contentions. Prom this judgment, the defendants appeal.

The facts are not in dispute, hut in making a statement of the case it will he necessary, as a basis for the proper understanding of the questions to he determined, to include certain provisions of the original guaranty act, as well as some of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Cotting v. Kansas City Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Steamship Co. v. JoliffeSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  4. Jeffrey Manufacturing Co. v. BlaggSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Allen v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Senior Citizens League, Inc. v. Department of Social SecurityWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Acme Finance Co. v. HuseWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Henry v. McKayWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. State Ex Rel. Gebhardt v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Perkins Manufacturing Co. v. Clinton Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1930

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API