Legal Opinion

People v. McNight

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 26, 1985No. A024095PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BARRY-DEAL, J.

Maceio McNight appeals from the judgment entered after his plea of guilty. Appellant contends that (1) this appeal is not subject to the requirement of a probable cause certificate pursuant to Penal Code section 1237.5; (2) appellant was denied effective assistance of counsel at sentencing because his counsel failed to urge mitigating circumstances; and (3) the trial court erred in failing to consider mitigating circumstances before sentencing. We do not agree that appellant is exempt from the requirement of a certificate of probable cause, and we dismiss the appeal. As a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. FosselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. People v. RiberoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. People v. DellesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. PanizzonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. ButtramCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. Hurlic, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. People v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. People v. BallardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API