Legal Opinion

Decato v. Goughnour

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 2000No. CASE NO. 98 CA 16PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Waite, Judge.

This timely appeal arises from the judgment of the Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas following a jury verdict in appellant’s favor. Appellant argues that the trial court erred by excluding from evidence certain documents and further erred by overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial based on alleged juror misconduct. For all of the following reasons, this court affirms the judgment of the trial court.

On February 2, 1993, Gene DeCato (“appellant”), while working for the Ohio Turnpike Commission, was traveling east on the turnpike when the vehicle he was operating was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. City of Columbus v. HodgeOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Tracy v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. City of Columbus v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Austin v. SquireOhio Court of Appeals · 1997

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sain v. Estate of Hass, 06ap-902 (4-10-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Beres v. G.S. Building Co., 2007-L-061 (12-7-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. J&S Motors, L.L.C. v. HendkingOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
  4. Harris v. Transp. Outlet, 2007-L-188 (6-13-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. In Re M.W., 07 Be 40 (9-5-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API