Legal Opinion
JOANNA v. ROUTE 22 HONDA
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 11, 2023No. 2:22-cv-07117Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY RONEISHA JOANNA PARKER, Plaintiff, No. 22cv7117 (EP) (JSA) OPINION v. ROUTE 22 HONDA, Defendant. PADIN, District Judge. Pro se Plaintiff Roneisha Joanna Parker seeks to bring this action in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. D.E. 1-2. For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS her application to proceed in forma pauperis but DISMISSES her complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Under Section 1915, this Court may excuse a litigant from prepayment of fees when the litigant “establish[es] that he is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Norman Grayson v. Mayview State Hospital Allegheny County Jail Camp Hill Prison United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Sandra Connelly v. Lane Construction CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.