Legal Opinion

State v. Jury

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1900PublishedCited by 20 opinions

From Multnomah: Alfeed F. Seabs, Jb., Judge. Application by the State of Oregon, on relation of Charles F. Lord, District Attorney for the Fourth Judicial District, for writ of mandamus to compel the grand jury of Multnomah County to inquire into a certain criminal charge. From a judgment dismissing the writ, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Bean

This is a mandamus proceeding, commenced in April, 1897, to compel the then grand jury of Multnomah County to inquire into a criminal charge against one Anderson, who had previously been committed to await its action. *543The grand jurors answered, setting up matters which they claimed constituted a defense to the alternative writ. A demurrer to the answer was overruled, and, the plaintiff declining to proceed or plead further, the writ was dismissed, and the plaintiff appeals.

About the time the transcript was filed, or soon thereafter, the grand jury was discharged, so that it is now impossible…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. California v. San Pablo & Tulare RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. People Ex Rel. Geer v. Common Council of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. Moores v. MooresOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Jacksonville School District v. CrowellOregon Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. HydeOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Greyhound Park v. Oregon Racing CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Eilers Piano House v. PickOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  4. State ex rel. v. WebsterOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  5. State ex rel. v. FieldsOregon Supreme Court · 1909

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API