Pollard v. Allen Sims
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtWalthall, J.
This case was tried before the court. In this case findings of fact and conclusions of law were not filed by the trial court. Plaintiff in error failed to file a motion for a new trial in the court below. In this condition of the record, there are therefore no valid assignments of error which we can consider. Acts 1913, e. 136, p. 276 (Vernon’s Sayles’ Ann. Civ. St. 1914, art. 1612); American, etc., v. Mercedes, 155 S. W. 286; Cooney v. Dandridge, 158 S. W. 177, 178; Moore v. Rabb, 159 S. W. 85; Dees v. Thompson, 166 S. W. 56.
Furthermore, the brief filed by plaintiff in error in this case…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- American Rio Grande Land & Irrigation Co. v. Mercedes Plantation Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Dees v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Kirby Lumber Co. v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
- Colorado Canal Co. v. McFarland & SouthwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Johnson v. LyfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth Bonding & Casualty Ins. Co. v. CatorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Earle v. BlankenbeckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Wilkerson v. Stasney HolubCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Calhoun v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Craver v. GreerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915