Legal Opinion
United States v. Christopher Wright
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 8, 2015No. 13-1766, 13-1767, 13-1768PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
VANASKIE, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Christopher G. Wright, Ra-vinder S. Chawla, and Andrew Teitelman filed this interlocutory appeal from the District Court’s denial of their pretrial joint motion to preclude the Government from relitigating certain issues under the Double Jeopardy Clause and from constructively amending the indictment. Because the District Court’s ruling is not a “collateral” order subject to immediate review under Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949), and was not otherwise a “final decision[ ]” under…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Howmedica Osteonics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- In Re McGraw-hill Global Educ. Holdings LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Robert MenendezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Pickering v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016
- In re CredicoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.