Legal Opinion
Bender v. Kingman & Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided May 21, 1902No. 9,810PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Error from the district court for Thurston county. Tried below before Evans, J. Rehearing of case reported in 62'Nebr., 469.
1Opinion of the Court
Kirkpatrick, C.
This is a replevin action brought in the district court of Thurston county by Phillip H. Bender, plaintiff in error, against Kingman & Co. and John H. Mullen, defendants in error. Mullen was the sheriff of Thurston county, and had levied upon a stock of goods under writs of attachment issued in suits brought by Kingman & Co. - against Weiser Bros., and in the action plaintiff in error obtained possession of the stock of goods claiming to be the vendee of Weiser Bros. An opinion was fthed in this case July 10,1901 (62 Neb., 469.) On application of plaintiff in error a rehearing…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Babcock v. . EcklerNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Reed v. NoxonIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
- Oliver v. EatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
- Carter v. GunnelsIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Bender v. Kingman & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by2 opinions
- Spaulding v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
- Wilcox v. County of PerkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1903