Legal Opinion
Cubic Corporation v. Richard C. Cheney, Secretary of Defense and Kollsman, a Division of Sequa Corporation, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided September 21, 1990No. 89-5277PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge D.H. GINSBURG.
D.H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judge:
Cubic Corporation bid for a contract to produce an Air Force instrumentation system, but the Air Force found that Cubic was not a responsible contractor for the project and disqualified it. The Air Force acted on the basis of information suggesting that a senior executive of Cubic, and a defense consultant employed by Cubic, may have attempted to bribe an Air Force official in return for assistance in obtaining the contract. Cubic filed suit in district court to overturn the nonresponsibility determination…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gelbard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. John C. Grimberg Co., Inc. And W.M. Schlosser Co., Inc., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- B.K. Instrument, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Ulstein Maritime, Ltd. And Schottel of America, Inc. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Janet Smith and David Smith v. J. Joseph Danyo, M.DCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Forsyth v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Solano Garbage Co. v. CheneyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1991
- Geo-Con, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1994