Legal Opinion
Geo-Con, Inc. v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 31, 1994No. Civ. A. 94-0820Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPORKIN, District Judge.
This is an action by a disappointed bidder arising from plaintiff Geo-Con’s nonselection for a solicitation issued by the Army Corps of Engineers. Plaintiff was the low bidder but was not selected after a determination of nonresponsibility. Pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq., Plaintiff challenges the Army Corps of Engineers’ nonresponsibility determination and the decision to not award the contract to Geo-Con as arbitrary and capricious, an abuse of discretion, and not in accordance with law.
The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Geo-Con, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
- Cubic Corporation v. Richard C. Cheney, Secretary of Defense and Kollsman, a Division of Sequa Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990