Baltimore & L. Ry. Co. v. Steel Rail Supply Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
1Opinion of the Court
ACHESON, Circuit Judge.
This was a suit brought by the Baltimore & Eehigh Railway Company against the Steel Rail Supply Company to recover damages for the refusal of the defendant to accept a lot of old steel rails, etc., which the defendant had bought from the plaintiff. On the 26th day of February, 1900, these parties entered into two written contracts. By one of the contracts the defendant sold to the plaintiff about 5,000 tons of new steel rails, shipments thereof “to be completed by May 31st, 1900.” By the other contract the plaintiff sold, and the defendant purchased, the old steel rails…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hocking v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Kunkle v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867
3Cited by10 opinions
- Elliott v. HowisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Hurst v. Altamont Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Bank of Buchanan County v. Continental Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
- Culp v. SandovalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1916
- Acme Markets, Inc. v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, Local Lodge No. 724District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.