Legal Opinion
United States v. Sammy Salazar
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 24, 2014No. 12-50695PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDWARD C. PRADO, Circuit Judge:
Defendant-Appellant Sammy Salazar (“Salazar”) violated the terms of his supervised release; and was sentenced to a prison term plus ah additional period of supervised release. The parties dispute both the standard of review and the legality of a special condition of supervised release imposed on Salazar. We review the district court’s sentencing conditions for an abuse of discretion, and hold that the district court abused its discretion by imposing the challenged condition on Salazar without demonstrating that it is reasonably related to the statutory factors.
I.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Mondragon-SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Ronald Scott PaulCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Daniel VoelkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Perazza-MercadoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- United States v. Rosie DigglesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. EaglinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Michael FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. James CaravayoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Ruben PrietoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.