Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael Fields

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 9, 2015No. 13-51060PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:

In this case, we must decide whether the district court’s imposition of a condition of supervised release prohibiting the defendant from “residing or going to places where a minor or minors are known to frequent without prior approval of the probation officer” was plainly erroneous. We conclude it was not and AFFIRM.

I

In January 1990, Michael Fields was convicted in Wisconsin state court of second degree sexual assault of a child. 1 He was sentenced to five years in prison, but only served one year; the rest of his term was probated. Fields was required…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. National Federation of Independent Business v. SebeliusSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. United States v. Ronald Scott PaulCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Larry PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Guadalupe AlcantarCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. United States v. Ruben PrietoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. Elliott DukeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. Jason ScottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  4. United States v. Eric WindingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  5. State v. McMillenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API