COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, Applicant-Appellee, v. Richard W. TOKHEIM, Respondent-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal by Richard W. Tokheim of an order granting enforcement of an administrative subpoena issued by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC or “the Commission”). For the reasons stated herein, we affirm the district court’s order.
I
The CFTC, which is charged with implementing the Commodity Exchange Act (“the Act”), 7 U.S.C. §§ 1-25 — the basic purpose of which is the comprehensive regulation of the “volatile and esoteric futures trading complex,” CFTC v. Schor, 478 U.S. 833, 836, 106 S.Ct. 3245, 92 L.Ed.2d 675 (1986) (quotation omitted) — is granted…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Marvin BerkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Comm. Fut. L. Rep. P 27,357 Commodity Trend Service, Inc. v. Commodity Futures Trading CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United Financial Mortgage Corp. v. Bayshores Funding Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
- Robert Lee Holleman v. Jack DuckworthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Wafra Leasing Corp. 1999-A-1 v. Prime Capital Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
- CALETZ EX REL. ESTATE OF COLON v. BlackmonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- Commodity Trend Service, Inc. v. Commodity Futures Trading CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.