Legal Opinion
Robert Lee Holleman v. Jack Duckworth
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 15, 1998No. 95-3152PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
The petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing without prejudice his application for a writ of habeas corpus. The district court concluded that the petitioner had abused the writ. Back in 1981 the petitioner had filed an application that attacked the same judgment and that was adjudicated on the merits. On that occasion, the district court had denied the petition, a judgment that was upheld on appeal. See Holleman v. Duckworth, 700 F.2d 391 (7th Cir.1983). The petitioner filed this petition on February 21, 1995, so the 1996 habeas corpus reforms do not apply. See…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Samuel C. Stoia v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Edward Spreitzer v. Howard A. Peters, Iii, Director, Illinois Department of Corrections and Richard B. Gramley, Warden, Pontiac Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Freeman v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Jack Indurante v. Local 705, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Robert Lee Holleman v. Zettie CottonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Holleman v. MillerDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2000
- Holleman, Robert L. v. Cotton, ZettieCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.