Legal Opinion

State v. Vesey

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided December 31, 1991No. 90-1827PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SACKETT, Judge.

Defendant-appellant Clayton Yesey was convicted following a jury trial of possession of heroin with the intent to deliver. He was sentenced as an habitual offender. He appeals contending (1) his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to object to opinion testimony, (2) the trial court failed to assure he understood the consequences of his stipulation agreeing he had two prior convictions and his attorney was ineffective in advising him on the effect of the stipulation, and (3) the trial court erred in denying his post trial and pretrial pro se motions. We affirm.

Defendant was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Grismore v. Consolidated Products Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. State v. MyersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  3. Hinkle v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  4. State v. BumpusSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  5. Snethen v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. BarberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. DinkinsCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1996
  3. State v. ShumpertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  4. State v. McBrideCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2001
  5. Gauvin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API