Legal Opinion

Jewell v. Middendorf

District Court, C.D. California

Decided May 19, 1975No. 74-2621-AAHPublished

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

HAUK, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Billy J. Jewell, a black male hired by defendant on December 11, 1972, brings this action under the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16, and under 28 U.S. C. §§ 1337 and 1343, claiming that he was discriminatorily terminated from employment on August 17, 1973, as a Boiler Plant Operator, WG-9, at the U. S. Marine Corps Air Station, El Toro, California on account of his race. On August 27, 1973, plaintiff filed a formal complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity office (hereinafter “EEO”) of race discrimination.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hackley v. JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
  2. Mary E. Seebach v. Joseph M. Cullen, District Director, Bureau of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  3. Ulysses S. Vigil v. Post Office Department of the United States of America and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  4. John J. Toohey v. Paul H. Nitze, Secretary, U. S. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  5. Thompson v. UNITED STATES DEPT. OF JUSTICE, B. OF N. & DDDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API