Legal Opinion

Hackley v. Johnson

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 13, 1973No. Civ. A. 1258-72, 2127-72PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GESELL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs in these cases are Federal Government employees. Each of them claims discrimination on the basis of race and the employment opportunities afforded them by the Government. Dissatisfied with the outcome of administrative hearings, they seek a new trial in this Court, invoking the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972, § 11, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e — 16, and other civil rights acts, as well as the Constitution.

The central question common to both of these cases is whether or not the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972, amending Title VII of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Irving Polcover v. Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Chandler v. RoudebushSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. McKenzie v. SawyerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  3. Ralph M. Hackley v. Richard L. Roudebush, Administrator of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  4. Herbert K. Wilson v. Federico F. Pena, Secretary, Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  5. Samuel R. President v. Cyrus R. Vance, Secretary, United States Department of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API