Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Goodhope v. Leyse

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1932No. File No. 7480PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, J.

This is an original proceeding in this court, seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the defendant, city auditor of Sioux Falls, to certify as sufficient, und'er the provisions of section 6332, Rev. Code 1919, a certain petition filed in his office asking for an election to remove the mayor of the city. The petition for the writ alleges that the city of Sioux Falls is gwerned by a board of commissioners, and that the defendant is the duly qualified auditor of the city. The petition further alleges that on the 25th day of June, 1932, the plaintiffs caused to be filed in the office of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Topping v. HoustonNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Hoyt v. Hughes CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Farmers' Loan & Trust Bank v. HirningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fedderwitz v. LambSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. State Ex Rel. Cook v. RichardsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  3. State Ex Rel. Coon v. MorrisonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  4. State Ex Rel. Walker v. GessnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
  5. McAthie v. FriebergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API