Legal Opinion

Thomasson v. Coleman

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 16, 1933No. Nos. 8961, 8996PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The con*382troversy to be reviewed on the present writ of error was before this court in a different form in Coleman v. Thomasson, 160 Ga. 81, (supra). In that action the present plaintiffs in error in the main bill of exceptions, claiming to be successors in title to the persons named in item 8 of the will of Ben F. Coleman Sr., instituted an equitable action, alleging that John M. Coleman was dead, his estate in the property terminated, and that a fee-simple title had therefore vested in the petitioners. The petition did not allege that John M. Coleman died…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Coleman v. ThomassonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lankford v. HoltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Taylor v. JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co. v. Richmond Cedar WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Carnes v. PittmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  5. Manning v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API