Legal Opinion
Aque v. Dexheimer
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 31, 1938PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On February 9th, 1928, the defendants Oswald and Emmy Rothman made and executed a bond and mortgage to the complainants, on lands then owned by them which are located in the township of North Bergen, New Jersey. Subsequently, the Rothmans executed a contract to sell those premises to one Natterer. Natterer assigned his interest in the contract to the defendants Daniel M. and Marie Dexheimer; the consideration for which was an exchange for property held by the Dexheimers (paragraph 2 of the counter-claim).
The Rothmans, on July 15th, 1929, conveyed the mortgaged premises to the Dexheimers. On…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Crowell v. Hospital of Saint BarnabasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1876
- Mann v. BugbeeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- Hoy v. BramhallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1868
- Meyer v. BlackerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
- Gorenberg v. HuntSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fidelity Union Tr. v. Multiple RealtyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
- Schumann v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
- Aque v. DexheimerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938