Legal Opinion

Aque v. Dexheimer

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 25, 1938Published

1Opinion of the Court

On January 31st, 1938, this court filed an opinion in the above matter, which is reported in 123 N.J. Eq. 133. Since the filing of that opinion, counsel for the defendants Oswald and Emmy Rothman, in a re-argument of the case, directed attention to the fact that the opinion failed to mention any consideration of the allegations in paragraphs 5 and 6 of the said defendants' counter-claim, which read as follows:

Paragraph 5: "At the time of executing and delivering the said mortgage by these answering defendants-counter-claimants, the land and premises securing the payment of the bond referred…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reeves v. CordesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
  2. Usbe Bldg. v. Ocean Pier RealtyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  3. Gorenberg v. HuntSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
  4. Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. RosenthalNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
  5. Aque v. DexheimerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API