Legal Opinion

People v. Mink

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 24, 1985No. E000336PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

173 Cal.App.3d 766 (1985)

219 Cal. Rptr. 291

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

DOUGLAS RAY MINK, Defendant and Appellant.

Docket No. E000336.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

October 24, 1985.

COUNSEL

Richard D. Rome, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Keith I. Motley and Tim J. Nader, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

KAUFMAN, J.

Defendant Douglas Ray Mink was accused of committing a number of robberies and other crimes within a relatively short period of time,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People v. DeVaughnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. People v. KaaneheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. People v. TassellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. People v. LaudermilkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. People v. BiggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. People v. RiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API