Legal Opinion
People v. Mills
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 27, 1992No. E009011PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOLLENHORST, Acting P. J.
A jury convicted defendant Mills of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of Penal Code section 12021, subdivision (a). He appeals contending that (1) the 1990 amendment to Penal Code section 12021, subdivision (a) is an ex post facto law as to him, and (2) his conviction should be reversed on due process and equal protection grounds because he was not actually personally notified of the amendment to the law, while persons actively on probation were notified.
*1282Facts
The relevant facts are simple and undisputed. On July 6, 1981, defendant was…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- In re E.J.California Supreme Court · 2010
- John L. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re EJCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. PetersNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.