Legal Opinion

United States v. 67.59 Acres of Land, more or less, Situate in Huntingdon County

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 16, 1978No. Civ. A. No. 75-692PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

HERMAN, District Judge.

This is a land condemnation case involving 67.59 acres of land situated in Hunting-don County, Pennsylvania, which the United States Government acquired from the Condemnees, Daniel C. Morningstar and his wife, Martha Morningstar, for part of the Government’s Raystown Lake Project. The case was tried before a jury, and on September 28,1977, the jury returned a verdict in the amount of $60,500. The Condemnees filed a timely motion for a new trial raising as grounds therefore the following alleged trial errors: (1) that the verdict was in the exact amount…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Kinter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
  4. United States v. 100 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  5. United States v. 84.4 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Drysdale v. WoerthDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. City of New London v. State, No. 512659 (Apr. 4, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API