Legal Opinion

Zimcosky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 27, 1988No. Appeal 3683 C.D. 1986PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Colins,

Francis M. Zimcosky (claimant) appeals an order of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the referees decision granting, the suspension petition of United States Steel Corporation (employer).1

Claimant, a millwright, suffered an injury on June 12, 1984, during the course of his employment. Claimant was not immediately placed on workmens compensation. On July 13, 1984, claimants department was closed down and all workers in that department were placed on layoff status. At that time, claimant was placed on workmens compensation pursuant to an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Piper Aircraft Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Fashion Prints v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Schiavo v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Harle v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Landmark Constructors, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Costello)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Horth v. General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Carpentertown Coal & Coke Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Rogers Motor Lines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API