Legal Opinion

Duckett v. Harrison

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 27, 1952No. 19PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNy, J.

In order for tenants in common to perfect title to tbe respective shares of land allotted to them by parol, it is necessary for them to go into possession of tbeir respective shares in accordance with tbe agreement and to bold possession thereof under known and visible boundaries, consisting of lines plainly marked on tbe ground at tbe time of tbe partition, and to continue in possession openly, notoriously and adversely for twenty years. Rhea v. Craig, 141 N.C. 602, 54 S.E. 408; Collier v. Paper Corp., 172 N.C. 74, 89 S.E. 1006; Lewis v. Lewis, 192 N.C. 267, 134 S.E. 486.

However, if prior to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Fort v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  2. Grantham v. . GranthamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. Albea v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1838
  4. Winstead v. . WoolardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. Thomas v. ConyersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pickelsimer Ex Rel. Gash v. PickelsimerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Brewer v. BrewerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Baldwin v. HintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Pridgen v. . LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API