Patterson v. Rosenwald
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.
— This is an action for damages to plaintiff caused by the bite of a vicious dog which, it is claimed, was kept and harbored by defendants with knowledge of its vicious propensities. There was a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $1000. However, as a condition for the overruling of the motion for a new trial, the court required plaintiff to remit the sum of $300 and judgment was entered for the sum of $700. Defendants have appealed.
The facts show that defendants are husband and wife and with their two daughters lived in Kansas City, Missouri, about a block from where…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Muller v. . McKessonNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Clinkenbeard v. ReinertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
- O'Neill v. BlaseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
- Merritt v. MatchettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
- Raymond v. HodgsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State ex rel. Kroger Co. v. CraigMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
- Hughey v. Fergus CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1934
- Dansker v. GelbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
- Gardner ex rel. Gardner v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1967