Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Rosenwald

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 21, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.

— This is an action for damages to plaintiff caused by the bite of a vicious dog which, it is claimed, was kept and harbored by defendants with knowledge of its vicious propensities. There was a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $1000. However, as a condition for the overruling of the motion for a new trial, the court required plaintiff to remit the sum of $300 and judgment was entered for the sum of $700. Defendants have appealed.

The facts show that defendants are husband and wife and with their two daughters lived in Kansas City, Missouri, about a block from where…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Muller v. . McKessonNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Clinkenbeard v. ReinertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  3. O'Neill v. BlaseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Merritt v. MatchettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Raymond v. HodgsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Kroger Co. v. CraigMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Hughey v. Fergus CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Dansker v. GelbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  4. Gardner ex rel. Gardner v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API