Legal Opinion

Skimin v. Fuelgas Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1954No. Docket 75, 76, Calendar 46,139, 46,140PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant Fuelgas Company from a decree for the plaintiff Jesse E. Skimin, doing business as Huron Hardware, being successor in interest to Huron Hardware, a copartnership, and having been duly substituted as party plaintiff, in a chancery case heard by the trial court concurrently with a replevin suit started by the defendant Fuelgas Company against Huron Hardware, in which the hardware company had judgment. Both cases involve the same transactions.. The decree in the chancery case adjudicates the entire matter by talcing into consideration the judgment in replevin…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Callender v. Myers Regulator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Kruger v. AgnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Anthony L. Arciniaga v. General Motors Corporation, Docket No. 05-6299-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. Wenzler & Ward Plumbing & Heating Co. v. SellenWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Wolverine Upholstery Company v. AmmermanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Owens v. HatlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  5. G. C. Kay Co. v. Standard Steel Treating Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API