Legal Opinion

Owens v. Hatler

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1964No. Calendar 59, Docket 50,407PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.

Plaintiff seeks to enjoin defendants from competing with his business and asks damages resulting from their conspiracy to do so.

*291Plaintiff and defendant Joe Hatler were partners in the so-called Turbulator Company. Its business was the manufacture, marketing, and selling of therapeutic turbulator liquid massage machines for treatment of horses’ legs. Defendant Joe Hatler sold out his interest in the partnership to plaintiff for $5,000. He signed an agreement in that connection which contained the following:

“1. Said Joe Hatler, retiring partner, will not sell or offer for sale, either directly…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Wilkinson v. PoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Bahr v. Miller Brothers CreameryMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Colton v. DuvallMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Weickgenant v. EcclesMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mapal, Inc. v. AtarsiaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
  2. ARA Chuckwagon of Detroit, Inc. v. LobertMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Boggs v. CouturierMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Owens v. HatlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API