Legal Opinion

Gaspar v. Merck and Company, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 26, 2000No. CIV.A. 98-3252PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

LOWELL A. REED, Jr., Senior District Judge.

Defendant Merck and Company, Inc., has filed a motion for summary judgment in this age and race discrimination action pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Document No. 15). Plaintiff did not file a response or otherwise oppose defendant’s motion. Upon consideration of defendant’s motion, and the pleadings and affidavits submitted therewith, defendant’s motion will be granted.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Ruben C. Gaspar (“Gaspar”) is a Pennsylvania resident who worked at Defendant Merck and Company, Inc. (“Merck”) as a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. NHS Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API