Legal Opinion

Hammond, Whiting & East Chicago Electric Railway Co. v. Spyzchalski

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 2, 1897No. 2,057PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Porter Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtComstock, C. J.

This action was originally brought by appellee, Agnes Spyzehalski, against the *9appellant, The Hammond, Whiting and East Chicago Electric Railway Company and the Chicago and Calumet Terminal Railway Company, for damages resulting from an injury alleged to have been sustained by reason of the negligence of both the defendant companies, resulting in a collision at a crossing in Lake county, Indiana, and by reason of which appellee was injured.

At the conclusion of her testimony in the trial of the cause appellee dismissed the action as against the Chicágo and Calumet Railway Company and trial was…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. LucasIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HixonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Morrison v. CareyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Pennsylvania Co. v. MarionIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. SnyderIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. Sing YowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Citizens Street Railroad v. HoffbauerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. People v. AlboriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Waugaman v. Gary Methodist Hospital of Gary, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Louisville & Southern Indiana Traction Co. v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API