Legal Opinion
Allen v. State, Department of Revenue
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 2000No. S-9247PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Lloyd Allien filed an appeal in superior court, seeking review of two decisions by the Child - Support - Enforcement - Division (CSED). The superior court dismissed Allen's appeal as untimely. Allen appeals. Although CSED now acknowledges that Allen *745did file his appeal within the time limit prescribed by Alaska Appellate Rule 602(2), it argues that the superior court's dismissal should stand because one of Allen's claims challenges an unreviewable CSED order and the other has been rendered moot by a subsequent intermediate appeal, We hold that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Borg-Warner Corp. v. Avco Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Mukluk Freight Lines, Inc. v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Far North Sanitation, Inc. v. Alaska Public Utilities CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- State, Department of Fish & Game, Sport Fish Division v. MeyerAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division Ex Rel. P. M. v. MitchellAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fairbanks Fire Fighters Ass'n, Local 1324 v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Huit v. Ashwater Burns, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
- D&D Servs. v. CavittAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- Republican Governors Association; A Stronger Alaska; and Erim Canligil and Dave Rexrode, in their official capacities v. Heather Hebdon, in an official capacity as Executive Director of the Alaska Public Offices CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2025