Nathan and Deanna Ferguson v. Shiel Sexton Company, Inc., WR Dunkin & Son, Inc., Lynch, Harrison & Brumleve, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Oct 10 2013, 5:29 am Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS: ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEES: PAUL D. LUDWIG CHARLES C. HOPPE, JR. Redman Ludwig, P.C. Knight Hoppe Kurnik & Knight, LTD. Indianapolis, Indiana Schererville, Indiana IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA NATHAN and DEANNA FERGUSON, ) ) Appellants-Petitioners, ) ) vs. ) No. 29A05-1301-CT-8 ) SHIEL SEXTON COMPANY, INC., WR…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jarboe v. Landmark Community Newspapers of Indiana, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Plan-Tec, Inc. v. WigginsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Armstrong v. Cerestar USA, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Perryman v. Huber, Hunt & Nichols, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Teitge v. Remy Const. Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.