Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Manix

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 1934No. 447PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HORNBECK, PJ.

Submitted on motion of defendants in error to dismiss the petition in error for the reason that there was no motion for a new trial filed to the judgment and decision of the trial court and because there is no order of the trial court overruling the motion for new trial and no • exceptions noted to the overruling of motion for new trial. ■

We are not committed to the general proposition that it is always necessary to file a motion for a new trial to review the action of the trial court. However, in this case, we have examined the petition in error and each of the four ■…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of ShaferOhio Court of Appeals · 1944
  2. Bettman v. Northern InsOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. In re Guardianship BireleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. Beachler v. FordOhio Court of Appeals · 1944
  5. Edward Wren Co. v. Retail Clerks Union Local No. 190Ohio Court of Appeals · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API