Legal Opinion

Longstreth v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1992No. 91-81PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDINE, Justice.

Appellant appeals his conviction upon one count of burglary with intent to commit arson. He claims that the evidence offered to prove the elements of burglary with intent to commit arson was insufficient.

We reverse.

Appellant raises the following issues:

1. Did the Court abuse its discretion by failing to change the venue of the case before it on the Defendant’s Motion?

2. Was sufficient evidence produced at trial by the prosecutor to prove beyond a reasonable doubt all elements of the crime of burglary with intent to commit arson?

During the early morning hours of March 8, 1990,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. SimmsIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Crozier v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Postell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. United States v. Antonio J. Mazza, United States of America v. Anthony DecologeroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  5. People v. SimmsIllinois Supreme Court · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Byron Nelson Griggs v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Kolb v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Tanner v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Kerns v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Glazier v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API