Legal Opinion

Ferris v. Mann

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 13, 1965No. Ex. Nos. 10610, 10611PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.

These are cross actions of assumpsit to recover damages allegedly arising out of a building contract entered into between the parties. The cases were consolidated for trial to a superior court justice sitting without a jury and resulted in a decision for the plaintiff in each case. They are before us on the bills of exceptions of Milton W. Ferris as the plaintiff in one action and the defendant in the other and the sole exception in each case is to the decision.

The record establishes that on February 13, 1959, Milton W. Ferns, hereinafter referred to as the “owner,” and Roy C. Mann and George…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Sgarlat v. GriffithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Cramer v. EssweinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  4. North American Wall Paper Co. v. Jackson Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Alterio v. Biltmore Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
  2. National Chain Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
  3. Dunne Leases Cars & Trucks, Inc. v. Kenworth Truck Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
  4. DiMario v. HeeksSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976
  5. Iannuccillo v. Material Sand & Stone Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API