Legal Opinion
Broam v. Bogan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 25, 2003No. 01-17246PublishedCited by 251 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALARCÓN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Jack Broam and Jay Manning appeal from the judgment entered on October 22, 2001, dismissing their first amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.1 In their first amended complaint, Broam and Manning alleged that they were entitled to special *1026and punitive damages pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 because Robert Bogan and Charles Ingram, while acting under color of state law, violated their rights under the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by251 opinions
- Johnson v. Riverside Healthcare System, LPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Broam v. BoganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Rene Botello v. Richard Gammick John Helzer Washoe CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Michael T. Swift v. State of California Department of Corrections Keith Tandy, and Steve Christian Maritza RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
246 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.