Legal Opinion
Michael T. Swift v. State of California Department of Corrections Keith Tandy, and Steve Christian Maritza Rodriguez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 5, 2004No. 02-57136PublishedCited by 112 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
Michael Swift appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against two California parole officers. Swift alleges that his Fourth Amendment rights were violated as a result of: (1) the officers’ investigation of suspected parole violations; (2) the officers ordering Swift’s arrest pursuant to a parole hold; and (3) their recommendation for the initiation of parole revocation proceedings. The district court found the officers entitled to absolute immunity under Sellars v. Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295 (9th Cir.1981), and Anderson v. Boyd, 714 F.2d 906…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Burns v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by112 opinions
- William Thornton v. Edmund G. Brown, JrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Daniel Chavez v. David RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Davis v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- Akeem Washington v. Shannon RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Sarah Patterson v. James Van ArsdelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.