United States v. One Book Called" Ulysses"
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLSEY, District Judge.
The motion for a decree dismissing the libel herein is granted, and, consequently, of course, the government’s motion for a decree of forfeiture and destruction is denied.
Accordingly a decree dismissing the libel without costs may be entered herein.
I. The practice followed in this case is in accordance with the suggestion made by me in the ease of United States v. One Book, Entitled “Contraception” (D. C.) 51 F.(2d) 525, and is as follows:
After issue was joined by the filing of the claimant’s answer to the libel for forfeiture against “Ulysses,” a stipulation was made…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dunlop v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Swearingen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- People v. WendlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Dysart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. One Obscene Book Entitled" Married Love"District Court, S.D. New York · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Brockett v. Spokane Arcades, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ginzburg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Zeitlin v. ArneberghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- City of Urbana ex rel. Newlin v. DowningOhio Supreme Court · 1989
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.