State ex rel. Employment Security Commission v. Tinnin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeNNy, J.
Tbe statute under wbicb tbe plaintiff seeks to collect certain contributions from tbe defendant, wbicb it contends are due under tbe so-called contractor’s clause, formerly known as G.S. 96-8 (f) (8), now repealed, reads as follows: “ 'Employer’ means (8) Any employing unit, wbicb contracts with or has under it any contractor or subcontractor for any employment which is part of its usual trade, occupation, profession, or business, and each such contractor or subcontractor irrespective of tbe place of performance of contract; provided, tbe employing unit would be an employer by reason of any…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Texas Co. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Texas Co. v. WheelessMississippi Supreme Court · 1939
- Gulf Refining Co. v. William WilkinsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Barnes v. Indian Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
- American Oil Co. v. FlyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.