Legal Opinion

Skinker v. Heman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 7, 1896PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Daniel Dillon, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBiggs, J.

This is a proceeding inequity to enjoin the president of the board of public improvements, and the comptroller of the city of St. Louis, from issuing to the defendant Heman a special tax bill for the construction of a granitoid sidewalk in front of plaintiff’s property. The petition is as follows:

“The plaintiff states that defendant, Robert E. McMath, is president of the board of public improvements of the city of St. Louis; that defendant, Isaac H. Sturgeon, is comptroller of said city; that said city of St. Louis is by its charter authorized to cause sidewalks to be repaired and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Farrar v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  2. Vogler v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  3. City of St. Louis v. WeberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  4. Tugman v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Lockwood v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. C. Beck Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Skinker v. HemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  3. City of Marionville ex rel. Grubaugh v. HensonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Heman v. St. Louis Merchants' Land Improvement Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Smith v. TaylorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API