Legal Opinion

State v. Copeland

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1896PublishedCited by 11 opinions

FROM OVERTON. Appeal from Chancery Court of Overton County. T. J. Eisher, Ch.

1Opinion of the Court

•Wilkes, J.

This is a bill against the. defendant, Hardy Copeland, and others, as sureties upon his official bond as County Trustee of Overton County, for school taxes deposited by him in the Nashville Savings Company, at Nashville, Tenn., called in the record and generally known as Marr’s Bank. Upon the hearing, the Chancellor gave judgment against the defendants for $3,119, and interest from October 12, 1895, and all costs, and the defendants have appealed and assigned errors.

These assignments are as follows: (1) In finding that Mr. Copeland was not sufficiently careful and diligent; (2) in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. PrescottSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  2. Permoli v. Municipality No. 1 of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  3. United States v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Boyden v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1851

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wiley v. City of SpartaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Thomas v. Carlton Ex Rel. Special Road & Bridge District Number OneSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. State v. GrammWyoming Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Board of Education v. NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Mayor & Council of WilmingtonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API