Legal Opinion

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Mayor & Council of Wilmington

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided May 19, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor:

The solicitor for Walsen, the principal in the bonds on which judgments were entered, makes the contention that Walsen is entitled as of right to a trial before a jury of the issue of whether there was a shortage in his accounts as collector of taxes.' He is not entitled as of constitutional right to have such trial afforded him by this court. Mackenzie Oil Co. v. Omar Oil & Gas Co., 14 Del. Ch. 36, 120 A. 852; Sparks, et al., v. President, etc., of Farmers’ Bank, 3 Del. Ch. 225.

If he is allowed a jury trial, it is only because the court in the exercise of its discretion deems…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. PrescottSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  2. United States v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Boyden v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. Smythe v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Mackenzie Oil Co. v. Omar Oil & Gas Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Getty Refining & Marketing Co. v. Park Oil, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1978
  2. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Integrated Health Services, Inc. v. Elkins (In Re Integrated Health Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2003
  3. City of Bayonne v. State Board of TaxesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  4. Saunders v. SaundersSupreme Court of Delaware · 1950
  5. Bon Ayre Land LLC v. Bon Ayre Community Association.Superior Court of Delaware · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API