Legal Opinion

Claim of Gaik v. National Aniline Division

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 28, 1958PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by claimant from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board which disallowed his claim for compensation, with findings of no accident and no causal relation. Claimant was employed as a taxicab driver, and his hours of work were usually from three o’clock in the afternoon until about three o’clock of the next morning. At about ten o’clock in the evening of the day of the alleged accident he collapsed and was taken to a hospital, where his condition was diagnosed as a coronary occlusion myocardial infarction. His claim that this heart attack was accidental in nature was based upon…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wiley Manufacturing Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. Proctor-Silex Corp. v. DeBrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  3. Lewis v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Knoop v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  5. Copeland v. Leaf, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API