Legal Opinion
Doe v. New York City Department of Social Services
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 2, 1983No. 590, Docket 82-7505PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SLOVITER, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Anna Doe’s claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Supp. IV 1980) against the Catholic Home Bureau (“the Bureau”) comes before this court for the second time. On the first appeal, we reversed the judgment entered on the jury verdict for the defendant Bureau and remanded the case for a new trial because the jury instructions were misleading and because certain evi-dentiary rulings were erroneous. Doe v. New York City Department of Social Services, 649 F.2d 134 (2d Cir.1981) (Doe I). After the jury found for plaintiff at the new trial and assessed damages at $225,000,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Olga Zdanok v. The Glidden Company, Durkee Famous Foods Division, Frank T. Alexander v. The Glidden Company, Durkee Famous Foods DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- White v. MurthaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Kerman v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Diversified Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- United States v. Nicholas UccioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Jensen v. ConradCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Kofoworola Adegbite, A/K/A "Gbenro," and Joseph Obalaja, A/K/A "Niran,"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.