Legal Opinion

Worthington v. Kenkel

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 21, 2004No. 03-0176PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CADY, Justice.

This appeal requires us to examine the role of the district court when presented with a petition for injunctive relief specifically authorized by a statute. Appellant sought an injunction under Iowa Code section 70A.28 (2003) to prevent her discharge from her employment. The district court, exercising its equitable powers, dismissed the petition after determining appellant had an adequate remedy at law under section 80.15. Upon our review, we reverse the district court order and remand the case for further proceedings.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings.

This action was commenced…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' CooperativeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. United States v. Odessa Union Warehouse Co-Op Cecil A. Schell Edward Sewall Marvin KleynCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Benjamin Feld, Larry Feld, And Judith Feld Vs. Luke BorkowskiSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. Larry R. Hedlund v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  3. Nichols v. City of EvansdaleSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  4. Joseph Walsh v. Teresa Wahlert and the State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  5. Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad D/B/A Canadian Pacific v. Iowa District Court for Louisa CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2017

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API