State v. Voelker
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.
The appellant advances four reasons why his conviction for the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor should he reversed.
It appears that premises owned by the appellant were searched by peace officers of Yakima county by virtue of a complaint for a search warrant, sworn to by a deputy sheriff, which contained the allegation that the officer had “probable cause to believe and does believe that there are certain intoxicating liquors being manufactured, ’ ’ etc. It is claimed that the court erred in refusing to suppress the evidence obtained upon the search under the warrant issued upon…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- De Graff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- Rose v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Toole v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- State v. DitmarWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Lowrey v. GridleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1862
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of Seattle v. McCreadyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. ChenowethWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- State v. CummingsWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Ladd v. MilesWashington Supreme Court · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.