Legal Opinion
Solomon Technologies, Inc. v. International Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 7, 2008No. 2007-1391PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
Solomon Technologies, Inc., filed a complaint with the International Trade Commission under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. § 1337(a)(1)(B), alleging that Toyota Motor Corporation and its affiliates imported and sold hybrid vehicles that infringed U.S. Patent No. 5,067,932 (the '932 patent). Following an investigation, the presiding administrative law judge found no violation of section 337. The administrative law judge based that ruling on his determinations that (1) the accused devices do not infringe the '932 patent, (2) the '932 patent is invalid for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cardinal Chemical Co. v. Morton International, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Odetics, Inc. v. Storage Technology Corporation, Visa International Service Association, Inc., Visa Usa, Inc. And Crestar Bank, Inc., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Sinorgchem Co., Shandong v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Hill-Rom Company, Inc. v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc. And Kci Therapeutic Services, Inc., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- The Toro Company, Plaintiff-Cross v. Deere & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
3Cited by13 opinions
- TNS Media Research, LLC v. TRA Global, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Baran v. MEDICAL DEVICE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
- Broadcom Corp. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- TNS Media Research, LLC v. TRA Global, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Skedco, Inc. v. Strategic Operations, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.