Legal Opinion
Skedco, Inc. v. Strategic Operations, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided December 8, 2015No. 03:13-cv-00968-HZPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
HERNANDEZ, District Judge:
Plaintiff Skedco, Inc. brings this action against Defendant' Strategic Operations, Inc., alleging that Defendant infringes three claims of United ■ States Patent No. 8,342,652 (“the '852 Patent”), which discloses a system for simulating hemorrhages in the training of first responders. The United States, through the Secretary of .the Army, owns the '852 Patent. Plaintiff is the sole and exclusive licensee of the ’852 Patent under an agreement which also gives Plaintiff the right to bring this action in its own name.
Both parties move for summary judgment…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Bias v. MoynihanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Skedco, Inc. v. Strategic Operations, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2018